您的位置: 首页 » 法律资料网 » 法律法规 »

国务院办公厅关于确保居民生活用电和正常发用电秩序的紧急通知

时间:2024-07-09 20:13:29 来源: 法律资料网 作者:法律资料网 阅读:8277
下载地址: 点击此处下载

国务院办公厅关于确保居民生活用电和正常发用电秩序的紧急通知

国务院


国务院办公厅关于确保居民生活用电和正常发用电秩序的紧急通知

国办发明电〔2010〕36号


各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府,国务院各部委、各直属机构:
今年是实现“十一五”节能减排目标的最后一年,各地区、各部门认真落实国务院关于加强节能减排的重要部署,积极采取有力措施,加大工作力度,节能减排工作取得了积极成效。但近期少数地区出现了为完成节能减排任务而限制居民生活用电的情况,为此,发展改革委等部门专门下发通知,明令禁止这种做法。随着年底临近,还有少数地区为突击完成节能减排目标,仍在采取限制企业正常生产特别是居民生活用电合理需求、强制性停止火电机组发电等错误做法,干扰了正常的生产生活秩序和电网安全稳定运行,在社会上造成了严重的不良影响,必须立即纠正。目前正值冬季采暖和用电高峰期,电力正常生产供应事关人民群众切身利益,务必全力予以保证。经国务院同意,现紧急通知如下:
一、正确处理节能减排与合理发用电的关系。实现节能减排目标要通过全面贯彻落实科学发展观,加快转变经济发展方式,大力调整经济结构,不断提高能源利用效率来实现。近期少数地区采取限制企业正常生产特别是居民生活用电合理需求、强制性停止火电机组发电的做法,不仅违背了节能减排的初衷,不利于节能减排的持续深入开展,也严重损害了人民群众的切身利益,危及电网安全稳定运行,是极其错误的,必须立即予以纠正。要立即恢复受影响的居民生活等重点用户的供电,不得非法干预电网调度和发电生产,切实维护正常的电力生产供应秩序。
二、全面加强电力需求侧管理。各地区要按照国务院部署,坚持节约与开发并举、节约优先的原则,进一步完善措施,加大投入,推动新技术、新产品和新工艺的研发和推广。电力企业要充分发挥主力军的作用,加快队伍建设,建立技术支撑平台和评测体系,促进电力需求侧管理工作深入开展。当前要完善和落实好有序用电预案,切实把居民生活用电摆在首要位置,关心好、保证好,全力保障医院、学校、铁路、交通枢纽、供水供热、广播、电信、金融机构、农业生产、石油天然气生产输送等涉及公众利益和国家安全的重要用户用电需要;继续严格限制高耗能高排放企业用电,对未按规定期限淘汰的落后产能和违规建成项目,要依法、按程序停止供电;严格控制景观照明用电,杜绝“亮化”工程等浪费现象。
三、努力搞好电力生产供应。各地区要加强电力运行监测,及时协调发用电矛盾,对少数地方采取的影响重点用电需求和危及电网安全运行的错误做法,要立即制止。电网企业要坚持统一调度,严肃调度纪律,加强电网安全稳定运行的控制。发电企业要加强设备运行管理,安排好发电生产和设备检修,积极采购和储存电煤,确保发电生产和供热用煤需要。对于非法干预电网调度和发电生产的问题,要及时向各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府经济运行主管部门报告。
四、标本兼治推进节能减排。各地区既要认真做好当前有序用电工作,严格控制高耗能、高排放企业用电,切实压减不合理用电需求,更要把完成节能减排目标与加快转变发展方式、切实推进结构调整有机结合起来,充分利用资源环境约束性增强的倒逼机制,加大重点产业调整和振兴规划的实施力度,支持新兴产业和结构调整项目,坚决抑制部分行业产能过剩和重复建设,特别是控制高耗能产业盲目发展和扩张。从根本上实现节能减排工作的持续深入开展。
五、加强组织领导和协调配合。各省、自治区、直辖市人民政府当前要妥善处理节能减排与合理发用电的关系,切实加强对维护正常电力生产供应秩序的组织和领导,坚决纠正限制企业正常生产特别是居民生活等涉及公众利益用电、强制性停止火电机组发电情况的做法。发展改革委要积极推进电力需求侧管理工作,完善工作机制,依法规范有序用电工作。国务院有关部门和单位要做好资金投入、完善配套政策和依法督促检查等工作。


国务院办公厅
2010年11月23日


体育总局、民航局、总参谋部关于印发《全国航空体育竞赛活动管理办法》的通知

国家体育总局 中国民用航空局 总参谋部


体育总局、民航局、总参谋部关于印发《全国航空体育竞赛活动管理办法》的通知



各省、自治区、直辖市体育局,民航各地区管理局:

  为加强和规范航空体育竞赛活动管理,确保其政治安全和公众利益,现将《全国航空体育竞赛活动管理办法》印发给你们,请遵照执行。







                              体育总局 民航局 总参谋部

                  2012年12月20日



附件:

全国航空体育竞赛活动管理办法



第一章 总 则

   第一条 为促进航空体育的健康发展,加强和规范全国航空体育竞赛活动管理,确保航空体育活动安全,根据《中华人民共和国体育法》、《中华人民共和国民用航空法》、《中华人民共和国飞行基本规则》、《通用航空飞行管制条例》、《关于加强和改进通用航空管理的意见》、《全民健身条例》、《全国体育竞赛管理办法》等法律法规制定本办法。
   第二条 航空体育是指飞行员驾驶民用航空器和航空运动器材在空间范围内所进行的体育飞行活动的总称。目前在我国正式开展的航空体育项目有轻型和超轻型飞机、特技飞机、直升机、自转旋翼机、滑翔机、动力滑翔机、悬挂滑翔机、动力悬挂滑翔机、热气球、降落伞、滑翔伞、动力伞、航空航天模型等。
   第三条 本办法所指航空体育竞赛活动,是由国务院体育行政部门和县级以上体育行政部门批准的,在中华人民共和国境内组织举办,并通过航空体育手段,面向大众开展的航空竞赛、表演和飞行展示等活动。
   第四条 国家体育总局主管全国航空体育工作,国家体育总局航空无线电模型运动管理中心代行国家体育总局行政职能,负责全国航空体育工作管理,中国航空运动协会负责具体组织实施。
   第五条 各省、自治区、直辖市体育行政部门主管本行政区域内的航空体育竞赛活动。
第六条 参加航空体育活动的民用航空器,应当符合中国民用航空局的相关规定。
   总参谋部、中国民用航空局等部门根据职责对空域使用以及参加竞赛的飞行员执照进行审核认可。
   第七条 举办航空体育竞赛活动,要遵守“安全第一”的原则,认真落实安全责任制,严格按照飞行活动程序组织实施。
   
第二章 竞赛活动计划和审批

   第八条 国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动计划,由各省、自治区、直辖市体育行政部门于每年10月底前,报国务院体育行政部门批准。未列入竞赛活动计划的项目需单独报批。
   省级(含)以下航空体育竞赛活动计划,由本级体育行政部门批准,报上一级体育行政部门备案。
   第九条 未经国务院体育行政部门批准,不得以“世界”、“国际”、“亚洲”、“中国”、“全国”、“国家”、“中华”字样举办国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动,也不得以“通用航空节”、“航空旅游节”、“航空文化节”、“航空体育节”、“飞行大会”、“航空体育嘉年华”等名义,举办国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动。
   第十条 申请举办航空体育竞赛活动的组织和单位(以下简称“申请人”)应当具备下列条件:
(一)具备法人资格;
   (二)具备承办竞赛活动资质的管理人员、飞行指挥员、教练员、裁判员和航空器维修人员等;
   (三)具有完善的竞赛活动组织实施方案,具备执行竞赛活动方案、规程和规则的能力;
   (四)拥有保障竞赛活动顺利实施的活动经费;
   (五)拥有保障竞赛活动所需场地、设施、设备、器材、空域、必要的无线电通信设备及频率等条件;
   (六)符合治安、消防、卫生防疫和环境保护的要求,具有处置突发事件的能力;
   (七)办理竞赛活动公众责任险和相关人员安全保险;
   (八)具备有关法律、法规规定的其他条件。
   第十一条 举办航空体育竞赛活动,申请人应当向审批该活动的体育行政部门提交下列材料:
   (一)航空体育竞赛活动名称、主办单位、承办单位、协办单位和支持单位等;
   (二)举办航空体育竞赛活动的宗旨;
   (三)经费来源和使用计划;
   (四)航空体育竞赛活动总体方案、安全方案和应急情况处置预案;
   (五)竞赛活动规程和规则,包括项目、时间和地点、参加单位、参赛办法、竞赛办法、裁判办法、奖励办法及反兴奋剂规定等;
(六)举办单位法定代表人签署的申请书;
(七)上一级体育行政部门要求说明的其他事项。
   第十二条 体育行政部门接到航空体育竞赛活动申请后,应当派出专业人员对其举办条件进行考察评估,以书面形式作出许可。举办国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动,在年度计划审批的基础上,应当提前6个月时间,向国务院体育行政部门提出专项申请。
   第十三条 获得体育行政部门批准后,申请人应当向当地空域管理以及治安、工商、卫生、税务等部门申请相关报批手续。国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动由国务院体育行政部门在审批前向总参谋部、中国民用航空局申请办理空域使用和航空器适航、飞行员执照审定等相关手续。
   第十四条 经批准的航空体育竞赛活动,申请人变更举办时间、地点、组织形式或撤销该航空体育竞赛活动,必须经原审批单位办理变更或撤销。
   
航空安全与管理

   第十五条 县级以上体育行政部门所属的航空运动管理中心,对航空体育竞赛活动履行以下管理职责:
   (一)制订或审定竞赛活动计划和规程;
   (二)审核竞赛活动方案;
   (三)监督竞赛活动的组织与实施;
   (四)审定竞赛活动场地、设施、设备和器材条件;
   (五)指导承办方办理相关审批手续;
   (六)审核参加竞赛活动飞行员的有效资格;
   (七)审核参加竞赛活动航空器和航空运动器材的有效文件;
   (八)对相关飞行员施行备案管理;
   (九)选派并培训裁判员和工作人员;
   (十)审定、公布竞赛成绩,颁发成绩证书和证章;
   (十一)处理竞赛活动中发生的赛风赛纪等问题。
   第十六条 主办方应按以下规定组织竞赛活动:
   (一)依据空域使用和飞行任务批复,申报调机转场,组织竞赛活动区域内的飞行;
   (二)按照竞赛活动安全要求,做好场地、设施、设备、器材及各项保障工作;
   (三)切实加强航空安全教育,严禁超出批准的空域范围飞行;
   (四)遵守体育竞赛活动宣传规定,展开活动宣传和推广工作;
   (五)对体育、军航、民航等主管部门的监督检查,应予以协助和配合,不得拒绝和阻挠。
   第十七条 各级体育行政部门应当加强竞赛活动过程的监管,对赛风赛纪及裁判员执法等进行检查监督,并视情况指派人员对竞赛活动实行督察。
   第十八条 竞赛活动应遵循公平竞争的原则,参加航空体育竞赛活动的飞行员、教练员和裁判员必须遵守国家对体育竞赛的有关规定,遵守体育道德,严禁使用兴奋剂、弄虚作假、徇私舞弊,严禁利用航空体育竞赛进行赌博活动,竞赛活动期间严禁酗酒滋事,违反者依据有关法规进行处罚并追究其有关责任。
   第十九条 航空体育竞赛活动安全管理,实行谁主办、谁负责的原则,主办单位对航空体育安全负主要责任。
   第二十条 申请人有下列情形之一的,根据情节轻重分别予以警告、全国通报、暂停和取消本次竞赛活动的处罚:
   (一)申请、登记中隐瞒真实情况,有弄虚作假的行为;
   (二)从事与申请书中载明的目的和意义不一致的活动;
   (三)组织的相关活动有害于飞行员身心健康或有损于社会道德和精神文明建设;
   (四)出现重大安全责任事故。
   第二十一条 未经国务院体育行政部门审批,违规举办国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动的,将追究主办方和承办方的相关责任。
   (一)擅自举办国际性或全国性航空体育竞赛活动的,将责令终止其活动,在全国体育系统通报批评,并处以主办方和承办方4年内不得举办航空体育竞赛活动的处罚;
   (二)未经批准私自转让举办权的,在全国体育系统通报批评,并处以责任方3年内不得举办航空体育竞赛活动的处罚。

第四章 附  则

   第二十二条 本办法由国家体育总局航空无线电模型运动管理中心负责解释,自发布之日起施行。

CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES ORDINANCE ——附加英文版

Hong Kong


CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES ORDINANCE
 (CHAPTER 71)
 CONTENTS
  
  ion
  I    PRELIMINARY
  hort title
  nterpretation and application
  he "reasonableness" test
  Dealing as consumer"
  arieties of exemption clause
  ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
  II    CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
  dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
  egligence liability
  iability arising in contract
  nreasonable indemnity clauses Liability arising from sale or
supply of
  s
  "Guarantee" of consumer goods
  Seller's liability
  Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass Other provisions
about
  racts
  Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
  Evasion by means of secondary contract
  Arbitration agreements
  III   CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
  International supply contracts
  Choice of law clauses
  Saving for other relevant legislation
  Application
  IV    CONSEQUENTIAL AND OTHER AMENDMENTS
  (Omitted)
  dule 1. Scope of sections 7, 8, 9 and 12
  dule 2. "Guidelines" for application of reasonableness test
  dule 3. (Omitted)
 Whole document
  
  imit the extent to which civil liability for breach of contract, 
or
  negligence or other breach of duty, can be avoided by 
means of
  ract terms and otherwise; and to restrict the 
enforceability of
  tration agreements. [1 December 1990] L. N. 38 of 1990
 PART I PRELIMINARY
  
  hort title
  Ordinance may be cited as the Control of Exemption Clauses
Ordinance.
  nterpretation and application
  In this Ordinance--
  iness" includes a profession and the activities of a public 
body, a
  ic authority, or a board, commission, committee or 
other body
  inted by the Governor or Government;
  ds" has the same meaning as in the Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap.
26);
  ligence" means the breach--
  of any obligation, arising from the express or implied terms 
of a
  ract, to take reasonable care or exercise reasonable skill 
in the
  ormance of the contract;
  of any common law duty to take reasonable care or exercise 
reasonable
  l (but not any stricter duty);
  of the common duty of care imposed by the Occupiers 
Liability
  nance (Cap. 314); "notice" includes an announcement, whether or
not in
  hing, and any other communication or pretended communication;
  sonal injury" includes any disease and any impairment of 
physical or
  al condition.
  In the case of both contract and tort, sections 7 to 12 apply 
(except
  e the contrary is stated in section 11 (4)) only to 
business
  ility, that is liability for breach of obligations or duties
arising--
  from things done or omitted to be done by a person in the course
of a
  ness (whether his own business or another's); or
  from the occupation of premises used for business purposes 
of the
  pier, and references to liability are to be read 
accordingly; but
  ility of an occupier of premises for breach of an obligation or 
duty
  rds a person obtaining access to the premises for 
recreational or
  ational purposes, being liability for loss or damage 
suffered by
  on of the dangerous state of the premises, is not a business
liability
  he occupier unless granting that person such access for the 
purposes
  erned falls within the business purposes of the occupier.
  In relation to any breach of duty or obligation, it is 
immaterial
  her the breach was inadvertent or intentional, or whether 
liability
  it arises directly or vicariously.
  1977 c. 50 ss. 1&14 U. K.]
  he "reasonableness" test
  In relation to a contract term, the requirement of reasonableness 
for
  purposes of this Ordinance and section 4 of the 
Misrepresentation
  nance (Cap. 284) is satisfied only if the court or 
arbitrator
  rmines that the term was a fair and reasonable one to be 
included
  ng regard to the circumstances which were, or ought reasonably
to have
  , known to or in the contemplation of the parties when the 
contract
  made.
  In determining for the purposes of section 11 or 12 whether a
contract
  satisfies the requirement of reasonableness, the court or 
arbitrator
  l have regard in particular to the matters specified in 
Schedule 2;
  this subsection does not prevent the court or arbitrator from
holding,
  ccordance with any rule of law, that a term which purports to 
exclude
  estrict any relevant liability is not a term of the contract.
  
  In relation to a notice (not being a notice having 
contractual
  ct), the requirement of reasonableness under this 
Ordinance is
  sfied only if the court or arbitrator determines that it would
be fair
  reasonable to allow reliance on it, having regard to 
all the
  umstances obtaining when the liability arose or (but for the 
notice)
  d have arisen.
  In determining (under this Ordinance or the 
Misrepresentation
  nance (Cap. 284)) whether a contract term or notice 
satisfies the
  irement of reasonableness, the court or arbitrator shall have 
regard
  articular (but without prejudice to subsection (2) to whether
(and, if
  to what extent) the language in which the term or notice is 
expressed
  language understood by the person as against whom another 
person
  s to rely upon the term or notice.
  Where by reference to a contract term or notice a person 
seeks to
  rict liability to a specified sum of money, and the question
arises
  er this Ordinance or the Misrepresentation Ordinance (Cap. 
284))
  her the term or notice satisfies the requirement of 
reasonableness,
  court or arbitrator shall have regard in particular (but 
without
  udice to subsection (2) or (4)) to--
  the resources which he could expect to be available to him for 
the
  ose of meeting the liability should it arise; and
  how far it was open to him to cover himself by insurance.
  It is for the person claiming that a contract term or notice
satisfies
  requirement of reasonableness to prove that it does.
  1977 c. 50 s. 11 U. K.]
  Dealing as consumer"
  A party to a contract "deals as consumer" in relation to another
party
  
  he neither makes the contract in the course of a business nor 
holds
  elf out as doing so;
  the other party does make the contract in the course of a 
business;
  
  in the case of a contract governed by the law of sale of goods 
or by
  ion 12, the goods passing under or in pursuance of the contract
are of
  pe ordinarily supplied for private use or consumption.
  Notwithstanding subsection (1), on a sale by auction or by
competitive
  er the buyer is not in any circumstances to be regarded as dealing 
as
  umer.
  It is for the person claiming that a party does not deal as 
consumer
  rove that he does not.
  1977 c. 50 s. 12 U. K.]
  
  arieties of exemption clause
  To the extent that this Ordinance prevents the 
exclusion  or
  riction of any liability it also prevents--
  making the liability or its enforcement subject to 
restrictive or
  ous conditions;
  excluding or restricting any right or remedy in respect 
of the
  ility, or subjecting a person to any prejudice in consequence of 
his
  uing any such right or remedy;
  excluding or restricting rules of evidence or procedure, and (to 
that
  nt) sections 7, 10, 11 and 12 also prevent excluding or 
restricting
  ility by reference to terms and notices which  exclude  or 
restrict
  relevant obligation or duty.
  An agreement in writing to submit present or future 
differences to
  tration is not to be treated under this Ordinance as 
excluding or
  ricting any liability. [cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 13 U. K.]
  ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
  Legislative Council may by resolution amend Schedules 1 and 2.
 PART II CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
  
  dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
  egligence liability
  A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice
given
  ersons generally or to particular persons exclude or 
restrict his
  ility for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.
  In the case of other loss or damage, a person cannot so 
exclude or
  rict his liability for negligence except in so far as the 
term or
  ce satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
  Where a contract term or notice purports to exclude or 
restrict
  ility for negligence a person's agreement to or awareness of it
is not
  tself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any
risk.
  1977 c. 50 s. 2 U. K.]
  iability arising in contract
  This section applies as between contracting parties where one of 
them
  s as consumer or on the other's written standard terms of
business.
  As against that party, the other cannot by reference to any 
contract
  --
  When himself in breach of contract, exclude or restrict any 
liability
  is in respect of the breach; or
  claim to be entitled--
  to render a contractual performance substantially different from 
that
  h was reasonably expected of him; or
  in respect of the whole or any part of his contractual obligation,
to
  er no performance at all,
  pt in so far as (in any of the cases mentioned above 
in this
  ection) the contract term satisfies the requirement of
reasonableness.
  1977 c. 50 s. 3 U. K.]
  nreasonable indemnity clauses
  A person dealing as consumer cannot by reference to any contract 
term
  ade to indemnify another person (whether a party to the 
contract or
  in respect of liability that may be incurred by the 
other for
  igence or breach of contract, except in so far as the contract 
term
  sfies the requirement of reasonableness.
  This section applies whether the liability in question--
  is directly that of the person to be indemnified or is incurred
by him
  riously;
  is to the person dealing as consumer or to someone else. [cf. 1977 
c.
  . 4 U. K.]
  ility arising from sale or supply of goods
  
  "Guarantee" of consumer goods
  In the case of goods of a type ordinarily supplied for private
use or
  umption, where loss or damage--
  arises from the goods proving defective while in consumer use;
and
  results from the negligence of a person concerned in the 
manufacture
  istribution of the goods, liability for the loss or damage 
cannot be
  uded or restricted by reference to any contract term or 
notice
  ained in or operating by reference to a guarantee of the goods.
  For these purposes--
  goods are to be regarded as "in consumer use" when a person is 
using
  , or has them in his possession for use, otherwise than 
exclusively
  the purposes of a business; and
  anything in writing is a guarantee if it contains or 
purports to
  ain some promise or assurance (however worded or 
presented) that
  cts will be made good by complete or partial replacement, 
or by
  ir, monetary compensation or otherwise.
  This section does not apply as between the parties to a contract
under
  n pursuance of which possession or ownership of the goods passed.
  1977 c. 50 s. 5 U. K.]
  Seller's liability
  Liability for breach of the obligations arising from section 14
of the
  of Goods Ordinance (Cap. 26) (seller's implied undertakings 
as to
  e, etc.) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to any
contract
  .
  As against a person dealing as consumer, liability for breach of 
the
  gations arising from section 15, 16 or 17 of the Sale of 
Goods
  nance (Cap. 26) (seller's implied undertakings as to 
conformity of
  s with description or sample, or as to their quality or fitness
for a
  icular purpose) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to 
any
  ract term.
  As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, the 
liability
  ified in subsection (2) can be excluded or restricted by reference 
to
  ntract term, but only in so far as the term satisfies the 
requirement
  easonableness.
  The liabilities referred to in this section are not only the 
business
  ilities defined by section 2 (2), but include those arising under 
any
  ract of sale of goods. [cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 6 U. K.]
  Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass
  Where the possession or ownership of goods passes 
under or in
  uance of a contract not governed by the law of sale of 
goods,
  ection (2) to (4) apply in relation to the effect (if any) that 
the
  t or arbitrator is to give to contract terms excluding or 
restricting
  ility for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from 
the
  re of the contract.
  As against a person dealing as consumer, liability in respect of 
the
  's correspondence with description or sample, or their 
quality or
  ess for any particular purpose, cannot be excluded or 
restricted by
  rence to any such term.
  As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, that
liability
  be excluded or restricted by reference to such a term, but only
in so
  as the term satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
  
  Liability in respect of--
  the right to transfer ownership of the goods, or give possession;
or
  the assurance of quiet possession to a person taking 
goods in
  uance of the contract, cannot be excluded or restricted by 
reference
  ny such term except in so far as the term satisfies the requirement
of
  onableness. [cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 7 U. K.]
  r provisions about contracts
  Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
  Where for reliance upon it a contract term has to 
satisfy the
  irement of reasonableness, it may be found to do so and be 
given
  ct accordingly notwithstanding that the contract has been 
terminated
  er by breach or by a party electing to treat it as repudiated.
  Where on a breach the contract is nevertheless affirmed by a 
party
  tled to treat as repudiated, this does not of itself 
exclude the
  irement of reasonableness in relation to any contract term.
  1977 c. 50 s. 9 U. K.]
  Evasion by means of secondary contract
  rson is not bound by any contract term prejudicing or taking 
away
  ts of his which arise under, or in connection with the performance
of,
  her contract, so far as those rights extend to the 
enforcement of
  her's liability which this Ordinance prevents that 
other  from
  uding or restricting.
  1977 c. 50 s. 10 U. K.]
  Arbitration agreements
  As against a person dealing as consumer, an agreement to submit
future
  erences to arbitration cannot be enforced except--
  with his written consent signified after the differences in 
question
  arisen; or
  where he has himself had recourse to arbitration in pursuance of 
the
  ement in respect of any differences.
  Subsection (1) does not affect--
  the enforcement of an international arbitration agreement 
within the
  ing of section 2 (1) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341);
  laced 76 of 1990 s. 2)
  the resolution of differences arising under any contract so far
as it
  by virtue of Schedule 1, excluded from the operation of section
7, 8,
  12.
 PART III CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
  
  International supply contracts
  The limits imposed by this Ordinance on the extent to which a 
person
  exclude or restrict liability by reference to a contract term do 
not
  y to liability arising under an international supply contract.
  The terms of an international supply contract are not subject to 
any
  irement of reasonableness under section 8 or 9.
  For the purposes of this section, an international supply 
contract
  s a contract--
  that is either a contract of sale of goods or a contract under 
or in
  uance of which the possession or ownership of goods passes;
  that is made by parties whose places of business (or, if they 
have
  , habitual residences) are in the territories of different 
States or
  in and outside Hong Kong; and
  in the case of which--
  the goods in question are, at the time of the conclusion 
of the
  ract, in the course of carriage, or will be carried, 
from the
  itory of one State to the territory of another, or to or from 
Hong
  from or to a place outside Hong Kong; or
  the acts constituting the offer and acceptance have been done in 
the
  itories of different States or in and outside Hong Kong; or
  ) the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to the
territory
  State other than that within whose territory the acts 
constituting
  offer and acceptance were done; or
  the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done in Hong
Kong
  the contract provides for the goods to be delivered outside Hong
Kong;
  
  the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done outside 
Hong
  and the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to Hong
Kong.
  1977 c. 50 s. 26 U. K.]
  Choice of law clauses
  Where the proper law of a contract is the law of Hong Kong only 
by
  ce of the parties (and apart from that choice would be the law
of some
  r country) sections 7 to 12 do not operate as part of the proper
law.
  This Ordinance has effect notwithstanding any contract 
term which
  ies or purports to apply the law of some other country, where 
(either
  oth)--
  the term appears to the court or arbitrator to have been 
imposed
  ly or mainly for the purpose of enabling the party imposing 
it to
  e the operation of this Ordinance; or
  in the making of the contract one of the parties dealt as 
consumer,
  he was then habitually resident in Hong Kong, and the essential 

不分页显示   总共2页  1 [2]

  下一页